_GOTOBOTTOM
Armor/AFV: Modern - USA
Modern Armor, AFVs, and Support vehicles.
Hosted by Darren Baker
Another USMC M1114 question
twong529
Visit this Community
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: April 21, 2018
KitMaker: 157 posts
Armorama: 113 posts
Posted: Sunday, July 08, 2018 - 11:39 AM UTC
I am planning to make a USMC M1114 shown in the first photo using the Live Resin MCTAGS turret, Bronco kit CB35080 and the Perfect Scale Modellbau conversion set 35092. PSM recommends using the Bronco kit CB35080 but my question is, did the USMC M1114 with that specific conversion set have the bottom armor as in the other Bronco kit CB35092 shown on the instruction sheet in photo #4?





This is the instruction sheet from the Bronco kit CB35092 showing the PE armor P54, P56 and P57 to be added. Bronco kit CB35080 doesn't include those PE parts. Would I need those PE armor parts for the USMC M1114 shown in the first photo?
Frenchy
Visit this Community
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Sunday, July 08, 2018 - 05:09 PM UTC
If you take a look at this Hi-Res version of the original picture, it seems that the add-on armor plate is visible...

http://snagfilms-a.akamaihd.net/3f/dc/b2479ebd4ab6961d847a95c240f2/635627276137697403-71004jpg

H.P.
twong529
Visit this Community
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: April 21, 2018
KitMaker: 157 posts
Armorama: 113 posts
Posted: Monday, July 09, 2018 - 04:58 AM UTC
Thanks H.P.! I found these images from the Perfect Scale Modellbau site and the first image shows they provide the armor for the front but none for the rear as seen in the second photo. I could copy the rear ones from plastic sheet from the PE in the Bronco kit CB35092.


kubisz
Visit this Community
Wojewodztwo Slaskie, Poland
Joined: February 18, 2007
KitMaker: 978 posts
Armorama: 977 posts
Posted: Sunday, July 15, 2018 - 09:04 AM UTC
Don't forget about missing underbody armor (present in all real M1114s, omitted in all Bronco's models). Please take a look at my WIP thread:
https://armorama.kitmaker.net/forums/253045#2144920
Some more photos could be found here:
http://humvee-models.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1560
Maybe You'll find this useful.
twong529
Visit this Community
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: April 21, 2018
KitMaker: 157 posts
Armorama: 113 posts
Posted: Sunday, July 15, 2018 - 02:39 PM UTC
Thanks Kuba! Great references for when I start mine. You did an excellent job on your build.
twong529
Visit this Community
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: April 21, 2018
KitMaker: 157 posts
Armorama: 113 posts
Posted: Sunday, July 15, 2018 - 11:30 PM UTC
Is the underbody armor on your M1114 the same as on the M1151 and M1113 GMV?


[/quote]
kubisz
Visit this Community
Wojewodztwo Slaskie, Poland
Joined: February 18, 2007
KitMaker: 978 posts
Armorama: 977 posts
Posted: Monday, July 16, 2018 - 03:39 AM UTC
M1113 and M1114 are based on the same 'platform'. But M1151 is different, that's why I've scratchbuilt armor shown at photos above and I couldn't use PE sets for M1151 available on the market.
You can use only some minor elements from M1151 kit - these bars protecting brake discs.

One more thing: Bronco made huge mistake in their M1114s - a hole for a turret in a roof is molded too close to the front. And it looks a little bit odd with MCATGS moved to the back. I've changed it in my model.
twong529
Visit this Community
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: April 21, 2018
KitMaker: 157 posts
Armorama: 113 posts
Posted: Monday, July 16, 2018 - 10:22 AM UTC
Thanks again Kuba!

Not sure how much more I am going to put into the USMC M1114. I already have the Live Resin MCTAGS turret and the PSM conversion set. My models will just be shelf sitters so not much of the underside will be seen so I probably won't get as detailed as you.
terminators
Visit this Community
France
Joined: February 20, 2012
KitMaker: 1,932 posts
Armorama: 1,907 posts
Posted: Monday, July 16, 2018 - 11:39 AM UTC
About Live Resin MCTAGS, I had some difficulties to build it. Resin doesn't glue well, armor panels don't fit well.

Too much parts in my minds.

On the other side, for the MTVR, Live Resin forgets to include new mounts for the turret base. Trumpeter ones become too short with the installation of the MCTAGS.

However, the Legend Productions MCTAGS looks more complicated.
twong529
Visit this Community
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: April 21, 2018
KitMaker: 157 posts
Armorama: 113 posts
Posted: Monday, July 16, 2018 - 12:29 PM UTC
Hi Alex, thanks for the reply. I have built the Live Resin MCTAGS and SAG turrets and the fit at the rear section has a slight gap. You can see the gaps on mine. They went together OK on mine. I used Starbond odorless thin CA with mine but it needs an activator. I also noticed some parts were really brittle and cracked even when I used a brand new blade or a PE micro saw. Both guns are dry fitted to see how they looked on the turrets.

twong529
Visit this Community
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: April 21, 2018
KitMaker: 157 posts
Armorama: 113 posts
Posted: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 - 06:12 AM UTC
Did the USMC use the extended tail pipe on their M1114's when deployed in either Iraq or Afghanistan? I found one photo showing the extended tail pipe but it looks like state side training.

WXerock
#450
Visit this Community
California, United States
Joined: July 19, 2015
KitMaker: 672 posts
Armorama: 668 posts
Posted: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 - 12:25 PM UTC
Looking at that photo and others I actually think Bronco got the position of the turret right. On pictures of the inside of the roof you can see that the turret sits much farther back than the M1025/M1045 turret. The turret on the M1114 looks like it sets closer to the vehicle's center of gravity. Thank you for the photo Terence.

Regards,

Eric
twong529
Visit this Community
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: April 21, 2018
KitMaker: 157 posts
Armorama: 113 posts
Posted: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 - 01:39 AM UTC
Hi Eric, I tested the Live Resin MCTAGS turret on the Bronco kit but the hole in the roof is too small for the turret to fit. I will have to widen the hole a bit. When testing it though, the position might be a tiny bit too far back when compared to the photo I showed but not by much. When I get to the point of mounting it I will just leave it as is.
 _GOTOTOP